Brutus killed Caesar to become the King?
No it isn’t. Brutus actually killed Caesar because of his noble cause. He is a
noble man. Brutus really loves Rome and he thinks that by killing Caesar, he is
doing it for the sake of Rome. Before he wanted to kill Caesar, he can't sleep
thinking is it right to murder someone he truly love. Brutus also said “I know
no personal cause to spurn on him, but for the general." Brutus does not
hate Caesar, he is just afraid that Caesar must turn into a tyrant. This will
make Rome suffer, thus because of love for Rome is more than Caesar, he killed
him. This is indeed a noble decision and a decision so noble i think that
Caesar would understand why Brutus killed him. Brutus is very patriotic and
what he done is all for his country. Thus, Brutus is indeed an honorable man.
Critical Literacy
Think as much as you can
Tuesday, November 13, 2012
Julies Caesar: Hungry for power
Julius Caesar is a roman dictator, a
successful dictator yet was killed by his own members. What he did to the
country, by killing pirates is for their own country sakes. Yes it true that he
is a sadistic men, killing people with no mercy, but you must look at a bright
side, it is all for the Roman Empire. He did many bad things, to others people,
not to roman but did good things to the roman. If you see it in a way, if Caesar
does not killed those pirates, they will harm the people of roman. And for the
true story, it was the ports that first capture Caesar at the first place.
Thus, an eye for an eye they say. Then he attack Gaul, and for what reason? So,
that Gaul won't attack them first. For Caesar, it was a golden opportunity to impress
the senate and People's Assembly. Besides, there were reports about
Germans that were attacking the Aedui, a Gallic tribe in the valley
of the Saone that was allied to Rome. A victory over the Germans would place
him on the same rank as his uncle Marius.
He spent the winter in Cisalpine
Gaul, having an eye on the city of Rome and giving instructions to Piso. And he
wrote the first part of his Commentary on the war in Gaul, which
had two purposes: he could boast about his successes, and he could explain why
he had to attack the rest of Gaul. It was successful: no Roman ever asked if it
was really necessary to conquer these vast territories.
From Hell : Fact or Fictions
I was read about the true history of
Jack the ripper, and the Johnny Deep film From Hell, I notice contrast where as
in the film, the director mostly take the storyline from Stephen Knights book
Jack The Ripper, the Final Solution, and others from the director imagination.
In the film, police
Inspector, Fredrick Abberline potrayed by Johnny Deep is known to be addicted
to Opium. However, the "real" Fredrick Abberline does not have any
history of usage of drug or even opium. In the movie, Abberline died of the
overdose of the opium drug, but the "real" Abberline died at the age
of 86 in his house.
Other than that, in the
film, we saw that all the victims of Jack the ripper are friends. However,
there are no evidence that link that all of the victim are friends even though
they came from the same area.
The way the victim was
killed is also different from the movie and real life. In the movie, Martha
Tabram is describes to be killed by having her throats and her vagina cut off.
In real life, she was discovered died from the 39 stab wounds to the chest, abdomen,
groin and thighs.
Last but not
least, in the movie, Marry Kelly escaped from the wrath of the killer. However,
Mary is actually the last known victims of the ripper. And most surprisingly,
in real life, there is no evidence that show Inspector Abberline having
relationship with Marry Kelly and he never met her before she was dead!
James Kelly is not Jack the Ripper
James Kelly the serial killer who
killed prostitutes in late 1980, is known for the suspect of Jack the Ripper,.
In the documentary, Jack the Ripper in America, a former head of NYPD cold case
Squad, Ed Harris investigates the potential suspect of the serial killing which
also occurs in America. The main suspects of his investigation are James Kelly.
Why does he choose James Kelly? It is because he is diagnosed of mental
disorder, capable of murdering using knife, killed his wife with a knife,
escaped from the mental institution before the white chapel killings and he
went to USA and there are murders with same MO with jack the ripper
However, I don't think that he is
Jack the ripper. Why first of all, there are no concrete evidence that James
Kelly is in London on 1988. Next, as a serial killer, why should he what for 3
years just to do other serial killings? Why doesn’t he just kill random people
at London at that time? Why must America? Yes he kills his wife but that
doesn't show any connection on the others killing. He kills his wife because
she thought her wife cheated on him. Yes he escaped from the mental
institution, but why kills people when he can just run away? And there is no
evidence that link James Kelly was in London when the murder occurs. Last but
not least, he went to America and then accused to be the jack the ripper. There
are others suspect that live in America, for instance, George Chapman, who
killed 3 of his wives. There is also evidence that show Chapman’s were in
London when the white chapel killing occurs. The best part of the evidence is
the letter. The handwriting of the Jack the ripper does not match James Kelly
handwriting at all! Thus, what i can conclude is James Kelly is not Jack the
ripper. The question now is WHO?
Alien on earth? You got to be kidding me
UFO-
ANCIENT ALIENS THE EVIDENCE
Well is it true that aliens come to
earth and help this early civilized people how to build something? Let took a
look at a fact by the movie. An Egyptian found a wooden bird call shikara that
looks like a model of plane and have characteristic similar to a plane. How is
that possible? My answer, my little brother can do that. It is a bird, a damn
bird. Of course it will look like that. If an alien come to earth and teach us
about technologies, why don't teach us about how to build a space craft?
Another facts that contributed to
the movie that alien exist is the ancient stone cutting techniques. It was said
that even we can accomplished what the ancient Egypt has done. However, if you
look clearly, the stone is actually scattered all around the place and it
doesn't look like alien do that. It seems that human also do that, with some
bombing or smashing. How can it possibly be alien? Too much watching DVD i
think?
So there you have it. Aliens don't
exist, if they do so, well be gone from the planet, or we can be more advanced
rather than nowadays. But it is up to you, weather to believe it or not.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)